É o seguinte estou fazendo uma segunda análise bem mais detalhada sobre o navegador do Google, o navegador é bom, estranho e diferente mas bom.

Continuando...

Para poder falar alguma coisa sobre o navegador do Google eu tive que instalar o Opera no meu notebook e comparar um com o outro, neste exato momento estou postando do Google Chrome, porém já notei que há muitas coisas em comum entre o Opera e o Google Chrome, como por exemplo, a navegação entre abas é absolutamente igual com a diferença de que o Opera é inteiro em Inglês e eu ainda não aprendi a colocar no idioma Português(pretendo aprender o quanto antes).

O Chrome é parecido em algumas funções com o FF e com o IE, por exemplo na hora de abrir um link de um site em outra aba, bastando apenas segurar a tecla crtl e dar um clique simples do mouse(com o botão esquerdo, para não pensarem botão direito).

Com relação a barra de endereços eu gostei mais do Opera que se parece muito mais com os FF e IE, as letras são pequenas ao invés de grandes(como no Chrome, apenas um ponto de referência).

Tá aí uma coisa ímpar que eu vi no Chorme e não achei em navegador algum, uma espécie de "gerenciador de tarefas" igual ao do Windows/Linux onde você visualiza o que está sendo executado no momento e quanto consome de memória.

O padrão de navegabilidade do Chrome é realmente diferente para quem está acostumado ao FF ou IE, pois as abas ficam em cima da barra de endereços ao invés de ficarem abaixo da barra.

Senti falta da barra de menus, presente em todos os navegadores, c, assim como a opção de inserir/retirar botões da barra de atalhos.

Gostei pra cara*** do contador de itens ao carregar a página que tem no Opera e não vi em outro navegador.

Bom para começar esse vai ser o 1º post sobre o Opera, FF e Chrome, quem tiver mais algum detalhe, é só comentar aqui mesmo, abraços.

So what does Chrome do better than IE or Firefox? Features of course - small things like being able to drag a tab away from its original position to form a new window, and the ability to type in a word (or few letters) from the URL or title of a website you have previously visited and it showing up in the Address Bar History. Things that make life just that little bit easier.

Of course Chrome, given what it was built on, is relatively stable at the moment - although it is obviously still in Beta stages.

-- I'm ill so I'll finish this blog post at a later date. Given that I am ill please assume me AFK for the next 3 days. Thanks :)

Also if you don't know Mozilla has alot of other good tools to use so check them out also.

So I took the plunge. I downloaded Google Chrome the other day, willing to give it a try. I've been a Firefox user pretty much since launch, so I was intrigued to see how Google's new browser would perform in comparison.

But, before I give my two cents, why do we all care about the 'browser wars'? An Internet browser is something that should just be 'there' and do it's job, invisible almost to the user. It's function is simply to load web pages. Like the menu on Sky TV is designed to browse the plethora of Sky channels, it performs its job, takes you to the channel, and users rarely question whether there could be a better way of doing it.

But the browser war has indeed captured our attention and headlines, and pitted the Mozilla Foundation against the behemoth that is Microsoft. It is a true David vs. Goliath story in the Internet age. And now Google has entered the ring, performing a double-clothesline maneuver with Firefox against Microsoft. Google has supported Firefox in the past, and indeed is continuing to do so, but has now, after much speculation, entered the browser war in their usual under-the-radar, low-key manner.

I've been using Chrome for a few days now, and I have to say, so far, so good. I was immediately impressed with the minimalist layout, but wouldn't expect any less from Google. But what struck me most was the speed - the tabs load noticeably quicker than either IE or Firefox. And they now run independently of the main browser, too, which means that if one of the pages on your tabs encounters a problem, the entire window doesn't shut down.

This happened to me for the first time earlier today. A website crashed, and a little window popped up to 'kill it', which closed the one offending tab, but left the others unaffected. This is a very welcome addition, and is something that the next iterations of Firefox and IE will have to include. On the downside, Chrome has crashed and shut down once, and I started noticing a bit of slowdown earlier today which was frustrating, but overall it seems to be working well, and I understand that it is still the Beta version so some minor problems are to be expected.

So I'm giving it a definite thumbs-up. It's quick, unintrusive, intuitive and simple. It's strips the browser down to the bare essentials, delivering a user-friendly interface which doesn't aim to please, but simply aims not to intefere with the browsing experience.

Safari is somehow... Pleasant to use. It's riddled with quirks that ought to be annoying. It takes a long time to fire up on a PC, and the big, gray, top space of the browser looks clunky and wasteful. Probably an artefact of Chrome/IE having that same space "smoked glass"ed.

I like the way IE does bookmarks, but I think I prefer the button bar concept in Safari. I find Safari's bookmark manager the least intuitive I've ever used, not that it's all that bad but instead of popping it into the window they replace your entire browser space with the bookmark manager and you have to select "Hide all bookmarks" from the menu or notice the little "book" icon is actually a visibility toggle. If you can wrap your head around this perversion of normal UI flow, you can probably get along with it fine.

Having just converted to using Safari's bookmark bar, I liked the presence of the same concept in Chrome; but then it one-upped Safari and put the pages I frequent into the "New Tab" display. IE8 does something sort of similar, their "New Tab" is no-longer the old "About New Tabs" page, but actually shows you things like tabs you recently closed, kinda neat. Safari, on the other hand, just shows you a blank page (I think you can configure it):

Yeah, don't try to read too much into my Chrome browsing habbits, I haven't used it that much. It has quirky problems with a bunch of popular sites.

The first couple of days I tried chrome, it seemed to have unpredictable performance. It crashed when I tried to go to Microsoft's site to see the Seinfeld teaser (note: I just told you that link crashed my browser, dumb dumb). However, I have definitely noticed that stuff which is JavaScript heavy is smoother and more stable, so sites like Facebook etc... I can best describe it as being like the difference between when you used to telnet into computers over a modem vs the first time you logged in to a server on a local network.

My more java-script intense tools at work feel nice and smooth: I pulled up the page that lets me review the chat logs (GM activity, HC activity, /reports, etc) and pulled down 6 months work of /reports in each browser:

• IE takes about a 60 seconds downloading the data, about 10 seconds loading it, about 15 seconds sorting it and then about a second rendering the resulting page (which shows 30 reports per page and 442 pages). It takes 1-2 seconds to switch between pages and nearly 30 seconds if you click "All".
• Safari takes about 53 seconds downloading the data, about 2 seconds loading it, about 11 seconds sorting it and then about a second rendering the resulting page. It takes about 1.5 seconds to switch between pages and around 12 seconds if you click "All".
• Chrome takes about 51 seconds downloading the data, about a second loading it, about 8 seconds sorting it and the page seems to render instantaneously. It takes about 0.8 seconds to switch between pages and around 6 seconds if you click "All"

(Yes, you bet I've suggested to Ramp that he look at whether we could switch to the Google V8 javascript engine instead of the one we're using right now!)

I tend to like sites that have that old "google" look & feel. Google is my search engine, I use LinkedIn, Friends Reunited and Facebook. My own web designs try to borrow from that same tones-of-blue-and-gray.

Because google is based on WebKit, like Safari they both share a cool pro and a bad con: The pro, resizable text areas allowing you to resize any multi-line input box on any page anywhere; the con, no default XML renderer so accessing an XML page just shows either a blank or bits of text. Both IE and Firefox have a default XML viewer that validates and then shows you the XML nicely marked up.

The first few days I was using Chrome, there were definitely some periods of sketchy performance that had me worried it was uploading or downloading a ton of stuff, but watching my modem lights quickly showed that to be untrue.

I do think Google are onto something with the way they are making every window/tab in Chrome a separate process. I've had a lot less multi-tasking issues with Chrome. It doesn't bring a whole lot of new ideas to the table, but it does a nice job of bring a lot of other folks' ideas together and polishing them well. There are some privacy concerns with the combined search/address bar and the fact it is continuously sending data up to Google.

I hope other browsers will take pages out of the Chrome leaf, but Chrome isn't going to become my preferred browser any time. I particularly hope it might shake up the Firefox team to quit being so Andreesen and focus more on function than form: they need to pander to the end user and the average web dev, not the detached and clinical pursuit of web standards to the letter. It surely is a pain supporting the mix of this and that across browsers, but that's how the web evolves - eventually some technique or practice becomes formalized and we move on. I see Firefox as a threat to that process, and supporting Firefox is always more work than as-yet-non-standard solution working elsewhere.

IE8 hasn't grabbed me in any particular way. It feels slower, it's clearly bloatier and although they've polished some IE7 adds, the IE8 adds feel more tacked on than IE7s Firefox/Opera/Safari clones.

So, despite my attachment to IE, here I am writing this article in Safari ;)

Microsoft üzgün: Internet Explorer Ağustos ayını önemli bir kayıpla kapattı. Rakamlar burada...

Google Chrome dünya tarayıcı pazarının yüzde 1,41'lik kısmına sahip olmak için sadece üç güne ihtiyaç duydu. Böylece Chrome rakipleri Opera ve Netscape'i geçmiş oluyor. Bu rakamlar, tarayıcı pazarının önümüzdeki günlerde daha da kızışacağını gösteriyor.

Net Applications verilerine göre Internet Explorer, Ağustos ayı itibariyle pazarın %72,2'sini elinde bulunduruyor. Temmuz ayında ise, yine aynı şirketin yaptığı ölçümler IE'nin pazar ayını %73.1 olarak gösteriyordu. Diğer bir deyişle IE, bir ay içerisinde %0.9'luk pazar payını kaybetmiş bulunuyor.

Yıl geneline bakıldığında ise Ağustos ayında yaşanan bu düşüş IE'nin yıl içindeki en büyük ikinci pazar kaybı olarak görülüyor.

IE'de görülen pazar kaybına rağmen, Mozilla Firefox pazar payını artırmayı sürdürüyor. Temmuz ayında %19.2'lik bir pazar payı elde eden Firefox, Ağustos ayında da başarısını sürdürdü ve %19.7'lik bir orana ulaşmayı başardı.

Opera ve Safari'de durum nasıl

Apple Safari'nin payı %6.1'den %.6.4'e çıkarken, Opera ise %0.69'dan %0.74'e yükseldi.

Tüm bu rakamları bir araya getirdiğimizde ortaya şu sonuç çıkıyor: Internet Explorer hızla kullanıcı kaybediyor, rakipleri ise her geçen gün biraz daha güçleniyor. Microsoft'un bu düşüşü durdurmak için son şansı ise, hiç kuşkusuz Internet Explorer 8 olacak.

Net Applications'ın yönetici yardımcısı Vince Vizzaccaro'nun bu konuda yaptığı açıklama ise şöyle: "IE'nin pazar payını bu denli hızlı kaybetmesinin birçok nedeni olabilir. Ancak sanıyorum ki IE8'in beta sürümünü kullanan kullanıcılar, yeni IE'ye geçiş yapmadan önce diğer tarayıcıları da deniyorlar."

Google Chrome'un başarısına da değinen Vizzaccaro, çok kısa sürede Google'ın Chrome önemli bir pazar payını elde etmesinin bir sürpriz olmadığı görüşünde. Firefox ve Safari'ye göre konum itibariyle Chrome'un daha şanslı olduğunu ifade eden Vizzaccaro, Google'ın isminin bile Chrome için yeterli olduğunu vurguluyor.

Not anymore. Unless you want yourself to be compared to Bill Gates' personal... er... serviceman, try to use something besides IE.

If you use IE, the message you're sending out is basically this:

Yeah, it is that big of a medal. And it hangs on your face.

Using IE means that you silently accepted the browser that Microsoft forced you to use by packaging it with Windows. It means that you are a tool. It means that you are a powerless tile in the road Bill Gates follows as he laughs his way to the bank.

Then again, if you stop using Internet Explorer after reading this article, you are sending me a message as well:

If you start using Mozilla Firefox or Opera simply because I told you to, you are a total tool. You simply accept whatever the majority says as gospel truth. If its that easy to make you change your preferences, I want you on my jury when I get arrested.

So what are you gonna do, kid?

As a matter of fact, there are some basic guidelines to follow while choosing a browser.If you are still confused, click here...

For instance, those Internet users who have Window Operating system, it is more likely that the Internet Explorers are already available for usage. The question in this case for an average Joe is why would I want to trouble myself to install another application, if the current application can do the job pretty well? Similarly, for those with Machintos OS, the Safari Browser is also installed. To me, no one want another application if the current one is perfectly usable.

Personally, the reason of Chrome is just to keep the investors happy. Since the investors are more concerned about the bottom line - their investment, Google needs to keep on innovating and raising the share price. In other word, Chrome is just a gimmick for investor.

For more info just visit this

i think it's a secret. thankfully, i know the answer. it's 9.6.08.

this town is in big need of a good social. and i'm not talking social networking.

     I was checking out Google chrome. I must say that its darn good and does what a browser is pretty much expected to do, render a page. It doesn't burden itself with a gazellion toolbars. Its lean and meets my expectations of speed. I think its the first time that some software launch was accompanied by a comic book to explain the need for the introduction of a new product. Its a beta version, and like one of my friends pointed out, still not ready according to Google. Well some of the google products have been beta for five years now, Chrome is just starting out. I do have a complain with Chrome ( I am sure others have faced it too ). For some reason the scrolling up does not work. Scrolling is very quick, but once you have scrolled all the way down, there is no way to scroll up using the mouse scroll wheel. The arrow keys work fine though. Like the firefox stealth mode, it has the incognito mode with the fedora and dark glass wearing spy. People refer to it as 'porn mode' and is quite useful for selectively storing history. The tab browsing and the animation displaying the sliding of the tabs over one another is cool. However, it has nothing to pull down a list of not in view tabs, so once the number of tabs go on increasing the tab label on the top goes smaller and smaller, untill they are just one character wide or even without any descriptive characters. 

     The overall user experience feels very good and is very unobstrusive. Its quite the browser one would expect from Google. Since I use the wikipedia a lot, the usage of the address bar directly as a search box for the site is quite a nifty feature. The bookmark management is somewhat limited, but I dont obsessively manage bookmarks, so serves me fine. As someone from google mentioned, they would consider it a success even if it forces Microsoft IE 9 to become half as good !

Tveklöst den bästa internetbrowsern i mina ögon, har du den inte så tycker jag du går in här och laddar ner det, finns också många andra bra program där.

Som webdesigner så tycker jag att det är användbart att ha olika tillägg som håller koll på Adsense och kollar Pagerank osv.

Men när jag surfar normalt så vill jag inte ha dessa framme, de är bara ivägen och stör.

Men med firefox och dess profiler kan jag ha båda dessa samtidigt.

Hur fungerar profilerna?

Firefox tillåter flera användare att ställa in webläsaren får att passa deras specifika behov och smak, alltifrån tema till tillägg och bokmärken.

Du kan ha en profil för din webdesign, en för privat surfning och en för barnen (vilket tillåter dig att höja säkerheten på webbläsaren)

Varje profil är oberoende av den andra.

Hur aktiverar jag dessa profiler?

1. Du letar fram genvägen till firefox på skrivbordet (eller så skapar du en ny från .exe filen)
2. Högerklicka på den, välj egenskaper
3. Till sist, i "mål"-boxen så lägger du till "-p" utan apostrofer i slutet av texten. (så det står något som liknar C:\Program\Mozilla\Firefox\Firefox.exe -p) och tryck OK.

När du startar firefox nästa gång så blir du mött av profilmanagern (sålänge du inte redan har firefox igång) som går igenom dina olika inställningar.

Se inserivano dei banali link l'utente poteva cancellarli facilmente. Così invece è più complicato (anche perchè il disinstallatore dei componenti non c'è).

Va bene fare pubblicità ma qui si sta rasentando l'assurdo.

 Este artículo ha sido también publicado originalmente, con ligeras modificaciones, en la sección de Ciencia y Tecnología de Público, bajo el título «Chrome: sencillez y compatibilidad frente a años de experiencia»
– por Alvy y Nacho

Con la llegada de Chrome el usuario final tiene una opción más para elegir entre el amplio abanico de programas para navegar por la Web. Aunque por tradición, pereza o falta de conocimientos los usuarios prefieran el navegador que lleva instalado su sistema operativo (Explorer en Windows, Safari en Mac OS X, Firefox y otros en Linux) desde hace tiempo es habitual instalar alternativas, probarlas y «cambiarse» de navegador al que más convenga.

Es muy fácil instalar Chrome para compararlo con los demás porque permite conservar los datos ya existentes de otros navegadores, por ejemplo los enlaces favoritos. Varios navegadores pueden convivir en la misma máquina sin problemas.

Google ha apostado por la simplicidad y el redimiento al crear su navegador. La interfaz es asolutamente minimalista e incluso resulta un poco extraña: no hay un menú tradicional y hasta la barra de navegación es única. Llamada Omnibox, sirve para todo: teclear las direcciones de las páginas web, buscar palabras o revisar las webs visitadas. En cuanto a la velocidad, incorpora el motor gráfico WebKit, considerado el más rápido, y también V8, una versión especial de JavaScript que es tremendamente veloz. En las pruebas la carga de páginas web convencionales es rápida, pero los servicios y aplicaciones web modernos, muchos de la propia Google (GMail, Google Reader, Google Maps y similares) se benefician enormemente.

Gears: uno de los secretos de Chrome – Entre las funciones que incorpora el nuevo navegador está el software Gears, que sirve para trabajar de forma remota, sin conexión, con las aplicaciones de Google como Gmail, Google Reader y otras, algo que es cada vez más útil para quienes usan esos servicios.

Navegando en “modo incógnito” las páginas visitadas no constan en el historial de navegación.

Uno del los apectos más novedosos y aclamados de Chrome es su robustez. Cada «pestaña» del navegador, lugares donde se pueden abrir diversas páginas web, es lo que se conoce como «un proceso independiente». Si una de las ventanas falla, eso no afecta al resto, ni al navegador principal: basta anularla y seguir trabajando. Al mismo tiempo esto evita ciertos problemas de seguridad.

Como empresa cuya principal fuente de ingresos es la publicidad hay quien cree que Google podría utilizar su nuevo navegador para recopilar más datos personales de los que los usuarios desearían ofrecer. La respuesta de Google ha sido la transparencia: su programa es de código abierto, de modo que cualquiera puede examinarlo y entender cómo funciona por dentro. Los programadores ya lo están examinando, y sin duda informarían sobre cualquier posible acercamiento al «lado oscuro» si la compañía cayera en esa tentación.

Chrome

Lo mejor:

• Es muy rápido y consume poca memoria. Las páginas web cargan más deprisa y se pueden abrir muchas pestañas a la vez, sin que se agote la memoria del ordenador.
• Interfaz simple y minimalista. Tras arrancarlo aparece una ventana y ya se puede navegar. Todo lo superfluo se ha eliminado, de modo que hasta los principiantes lo encontrarán fácil de usar.
• Robusto y seguro. Se pueden hacer varias cosas a la vez, y si una página web «se rompe» no afecta a otras ventanas o pestañas, que continuan funcionando de forma independiente.

Lo peor:

• Posibles incompatibilidades debido a que es muy nuevo. Algunas páginas web antiguas pueden no verse correctamente con Chrome, hasta que sus propietarios las arreglen o rediseñen un poco.
• Interfaz «extraña» poco convencional. Su aspecto minimalista puede inducir a la confusión, especialmente entre quienes están acostumbrados a lo tradicional y no quieran innovaciones.
• Carencia de extensiones. En esta primera versión, Google Grome no se puede ampliar mediante módulos, es algo que históricamente ha permitido hacer más versátiles a todos los navegadores. Al menos los plug-ins básicos como Flash, QuickTime, Java y Acrobat sí funcionan.

Firefox

Lo mejor:

• Gran cantidad de extensiones y plug-ins. Son pequeños programas que amplian las funciones del navegador, desarrollados por programadores independientes. Literalmente hay cientos y permiten tener un «Firefox a medida».
• Cumple sobradamente los estándares Web. Es uno de los navegadores más respetuosos con las «reglas de la Web», los lenguajes en que están escritas las páginas de Internet.
• Multiplataforma, sirve para cualquier sistema operativo. Las personas que utilizan diversos tipos de ordenadores pueden emplear el mismo navegador en todos ellos.

Lo peor:

• Consume demasiada memoria. Si al navegar se abren muchas pestañas o ventanas el rendimiento cae en picado; es un problema pendiente de solucionar en próximas versiones.
• Rendimiento y estabilidad. Incluso las versiones «finales» adolecen de cierta inestabilidad que provoca cuelgues y estropicios al visitar ciertos sitios web o forzar un poco su funcionamiento.
• Vulnerabilidades, que son rápidamente corregidas. Aunque se descubren a menudo fallos de seguridad, a las 24 horas suele publicarse un parche para resolver el problema.

Internet Explorer

Lo mejor:

• Es el más difundido, todas las webs funcionan correctamente con él. Su privilegiada posición en el mercado durante años ha hecho que cualquier página web se compruebe siempre para su funcionamiento en Explorer, porque es el que usa la mayor parte de los visitantes.
• Integración con Windows. Está en la propia naturaleza de Explorer ser parte de la experiencia del usuario en cualquier momento, de modo que muchas aplicaciones Windows utilizan partes del navegador para funcionar, creando una experiencia suave y uniforme.
• Extensiones, componentes ActiveX. Los programadores pueden añadir funciones a Explorer para realizar diversas tareas especializadas, haciéndolo así más versátil.

Lo peor:

• Vulnerabilidades, que tardan en corregirse. Los constantes agujeros de seguridad de Explorer son ya una tradición, y como promedio tardan unos nueve días en ser corregidos mediante una revisión o parche.
• Pobre gestión de los estándares Web. Tradicionalmente Microsoft ha «reinventado» los estándares a su conveniencia, de modo que quienes crean las páginas web han de tratar a Explorer como un si fuera «caso especial», toda una pérdida de tiempo y recursos.
• Ciclo de versiones y revisiones lento. Antiguamente considerado una ventaja, hoy en día no se entiende que entre versión y versión de un programa de este tipo transcurran en ocasiones varios años. Esto ha mejorado algo en Explorer 7 y 8.

Fellow Snagsta co-founder and developer extraordinaire Paul Stancer has been staying with me this week. I don’t get to see him much as I live in central London whereas Paul lives in a remote cave in one of Hong Kong’s outlying islands.

At about 7.30 the other morning I stumbled in to him at the breakfast table and saw he was having a play around with Google’s new browser Chrome. We wanted to see if the private beta version of Snagsta worked on it and we were glad to see it did (we would have been pretty shafted if it didn’t).

Later that day I read a review about it from Nick Carr on RoughType via Nic Brisbourne’s Equity Kicker blog.

I’ve just had a test drive and have also read up on some more of its features. Here are a list of eight things I like about it and why it could be better than the latest versions of both IE and Firefox:

1. More stability

Google implies that Chrome is more stable than existing browsers. A major selling point for me. As their little Google's comic book puts it, “When you’re writing an important email or editing a document a browser crash is a big deal”.

2. More speed

Google claim that sites will download quicker on Chrome; this appears to have something to do with Chrome’s JavaScript Virtual Machine named V8. Google state that Chrome looks at the JavaScript source code and “generates machine code that can run directly on the CPU that’s running the browser”, this apparently helps speed things up.

Brendan Eich (the founder of Mozilla CTO and JavaScript creator) claims a new Firefox's new TraceMonkey JavaScript engine outperforms V8 so this particular claim is hard to verify.

3. More secure

I like how they have built Chrome using a sandboxing technique that prevents unwanted software installing itself on your machine and stops what happens on one tab affecting what happens on another.

4. More open

Google have decided to open source the entire browser. This could be of huge benefit to the web community. Yes, I know Google has more money than God so they can afford to do this but they deserve a pat on the back for doing this.

5. More style

Google definitely lacks Apple’s style but what they’ve build here looks really slick. I’m a big fan of the smooth and uncluttered look and feel.

6. A dynamic start page

Chrome have done away with the traditional start page approach used by other browsers to display your 9 most visited pages when you boot it up.

7. More Privacy

Google have included an “Incognito window” in this build. None of your history is saved in the browser when you use this window and when you close it the cookies from that session are wiped out.

8. Better approach to blocking pop ups

Pop ups are confined to stay in the tab they came from unless you want to drag them out in to a new tab. I just tested this out on one of my favourite music sites and it works like a treat.

Nice job Sergey and Larry.

Like this post? Subscribe to our RSS feed and get loads more!

The much talked about browser by Google has finally been released on 2^nd of September. It’s been named Chrome. Like most top browsers it is free to download. So I went ahead and downloaded it.

I am very archaic in the sense that despite being dubbed as “Slow” I am a huge fan of Internet Explorer. However, when the browsing gets tedious and as slow as mule I switch to alternate browser. Since beginning, that is when I started using net about ten years ago, I used to download Netscape browser as well. It was (still is) fast. Years later Firefox was introduced that took the market by storm; I think more than half of America uses it. I have tested Firefox as well. It’s fast no doubt and has beaten Netscape in fast browsing.

“Fastness” is what a user looks for. Chrome has been publicized as fast, easy yet sophisticated to use. After hearing it from a friend and reading about it on the Google website I thought to give it a try. It is very simple to use – has interesting features more or less the same what Netscape, IE and Firefox offers but I like it for its fresh and neat look.

Some people have experienced problems with Chrome. I browsed for an hour and to me it looked absolutely fine and fast. It’s a BETA release which means it has a long way to go but still it seems very useful, workable and quick. I didn’t like one thing though that it saves a complete browsing history… something I don’t prefer. You can delete it but it feels cumbersome.

So now I have five browsers; IE, Netscape, Firefox, Opera and Chrome. Opera is quick too but it can’t display some websites properly. From now on it is either IE or Chrome for me.

Closures particularly are one of its most awesomely powerful features. Once properly understood they tend to roll off the keyboard almost by accident. It makes you wonder how you ever wrote software which doesn't have them.

Much like my comments about C# thread syntax being easy to use and abuse without realising it, closures are easy to create, but have potentially harmful consequences for the unwary, particularly in IE. To avoid accidentally stepping on a closer landmine it is necessary to understand their mechanism. This depends largely on the role of scope chains in identifier resolution and so on the resolution of property names on objects.

Laurens van den Oever's solutionto stop you wetting yourself when programming for IE is a good one.  Incidentally, I needed a good XML to JSON converter and fairly randomly chose Thomas Frank's to get me going. I intended to revisit this a write my own, but it's been so good I shan't bother - it's been flawless.

Despues de mi escapada por el internet, vuelvo con nueva informacion enseñandoles este novedoso explorador creado por la empresa internacional Google, lo que ha revolucionado la informatica desde su motor de busqueda que tan famosamente se ha hecho.

segun fuentes, 3.5 millones de personas han bajado este poderoso explorador el dia martes (dia de su lanzamiento en Buenos Aires, México, San Pablo, Estados Unidos y Europa...

Se rumora que este explorador tendra la habilidad de poder ser compatible con los archivos de Microsoft Office, es tipo Docs de Google, sin embargo ahora tendras la oportunidad de abrirlo en cualquier parte y deshacerte de ese molesto .docx o .xslx

Ahora tendra la rivalidad con Firefox, IE, Opera, entre otros, lo que llevara que Microsoft realize programas "mas complejos" para poder venderlos, porque ahora el software esta al alcance de todos.

Bajarlo??

puedes hacerlo desde aqui!

Y a tu, ya lo usaste??

Want to download it? Here is the link [Google Chrome]

Credit: Gizmodo

Fuente: barrapunto

Nicht, dass ich besonders scharf auf den Internet Explorer ins einer aktuellen oder kommenden Version wäre. Aber wie schon bei Chrome gesagt, als Webentwickler muss man ja auf dem laufenden sein! Und ausserdem, nach dem IE7 kann man ja nicht mehr so viel falsch machen, so dass der IE8 vielleicht ja ganz interessant ist, jedenfalls für die Zeit des Tests.